The US Government is looking to sell nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia without the consent of Congress, according to a new report from congressional Democrats.

The sale would be illegal under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, which requires congressional approval for the transfer of nuclear technology to a foreign country.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

The report, “Whistle-blowers Raise Grave Concerns with Trump Administration’s Efforts to Transfer Sensitive Nuclear Technology to Saudi Arabia”, is built from a number of testimonies by unnamed whistleblowers and prepared for House of Representatives chair Elijah Cummings (D-MD).

What the testimony says

The report alleges that US efforts to sell nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia have been conducted from the start of the Trump administration.

The allegations revolve around IP3 International, a consortium of US companies that intends to build nuclear plants in Saudi Arabia.

Key supporters of IP3’s proposals include former National Security Advisor and IP3 advisor general Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump’s inaugural committee chairman Thomas Barrack, and National Security Council (NSC) senior director for Middle East and North African affairs Thomas Harvey.

Flynn had already made plans to develop “dozens of nuclear power plants” during the presidential transition period. These dozens then became“40 nuclear power plants” on 27 January 2017 according to the report, as Harvey asked NSC staff to add this information to a briefing package for Trump’s call with King Salman of Saudi Arabia.

NSC staff and other senior people within the administration informed Harvey that these plans would be potentially illegal and should not be included in the call.

Years in the making

After meeting Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in March 2017, a White House statement announced: “A new United States-Saudi program…in energy, industry, infrastructure and technology worth potentially more than $200bn in direct and indirect investments within the next four years.”

Energy secretary Rick Perry is alleged to have become part of the project in 2018. During an interagency discussion in Riyadh, he was quoted as telling Saudi officials that it was important “to be perceived to be strong on non-proliferation.”

On 12 February 2019, President Trump participated in a White House meeting that the whistleblower alleges was initiated by IP3. During the meeting, Trump was reportedly “extremely supportive” of plans to sell nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia.

The BBC reports that the Democrat-led House has launched an enquiry into the plans, and will look to investigate whether the Trump administration has acted “in the national security interests of the United States or, rather, [to] serve those who stand to gain financially.”

The White House has not as yet commented on this report.