South Korea, one of the world’s top energy consumers, was all geared up to boost its nuclear power generation in 2012, but a sudden change of plan has redirected the country back down the road of using fossil fuels.

In a 2011 report published by market researcher Business Monitor International, it appeared that Japan’s troubles resulting from the Fukushima disaster had done nothing to halt South Korea’s plans for nuclear, a resource it already relies on for 30% of it electricity needs.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

The ‘South Korea Power Report Q2 2012’ showed that the country aimed to build a number of new reactors, increase its annual growth of nuclear generation by five percent and cut the level of emissions from its coal, oil and gas sites.


Related project


Yonghungdo Power Plant, South Korea

The $2.5bn 1,600MW Yonghungdo plant has been completed on the Yonghungdo island near Inchon, South Korea.


But, in an unexpected turn of events the Korea Electric Power Corp, the country’s electricity monopoly, has said it may increase coal imports to replace nuclear altogether.

The news follows the shutdown of the Kori-1 reactor in Busan on March 13, two days after the first anniversary of Fukushima and five weeks after a 12-minute blackout occurred at the plant, an incident the head of Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power, Jong-shin Kim, reportedly resigned over.

Concerns about nuclear safety has also led local environmental groups to campaign against government plans to extend the life of Wolsong-1 in North Gyeongsang province and other older reactors in the country.

South Korean coal power rates: catching up with China and Japan

Dangjin power plant.

Around 65% of the South Korea’s electricity needs were met by coal in 2011, and the bulk of power was generated at sites such as the Dangjin Coal-Fired Power Plant.


In January 2012, South Korea coal imports registered at 11.47 million tons, 2.5% higher than the previous month and around 4.6% higher than January 2011, according to figures from ICAP Shipping.

South Korea is already the third-largest importer of thermal coal, but further increases in the trading of this resource could see the country soon catch up with Japan and China.

Around 65% of the South Korea’s electricity needs were met by coal in 2011, and the bulk of power was generated at sites such as the Dangjin Coal-Fired Power Plant, which has been in operation since 2000, the $2.5bn 1,600MW Yonghungdo plant located near the city of Inchon, and Korea Electric Power Corp’s largest coal power facility, the Hadong plant, which has six 500MW units.
Other coal-fired power stations in South Korea include the Honam plant, which has been in operation since 1973, and the 3,240-MW Samcheonpo thermal power plant.

“In January 2012, South Korea coal imports registered at 11.47 million tons, 2.5% higher than the previous month and around 4.6% higher than January 2011.”

There are plans boost the nation’s power capacity by adding more power plants, but with government targets to reduce energy intensity by 46% by 2030 under its Basic National Energy Plan, will the use of coal help or hinder this aim?

Energy consumption in South Korea is more than twice as high as the world average (around five tons of oil equivalent per capita in 2010), according to the South Korea Energy Efficiency report, and electricity prices in the country only cover 87% of the cost of generating electricity.

But, coal could help lower the cost of energy, said Osamu Fujisawa, an independent energy economist in Tokyo. “If you’re trying to increase summer power generation, coal is the best in terms of cost,” Fujisawa told Bloomberg.

Coal prices reduced dramatically from $123 per ton in February to $103 a ton in April 2012, despite an increase in demand from India and China. So, coal power could help South Korea’s economy become more energy efficient, but what about its impact on the environment?

In November 2009, South Korea set a target to reduce its carbon emissions by 30% from the predicted level by 2020, but with plans to fuel power with more imported coal, this target could be drastically underachieved.

Using cheap coal to generate power while reducing the release of harmful greenhouse gases into the atmosphere is a major challenge, but one South Korean company may have found the ultimate solution.

Korea Southern Power’s $3bn Samcheok green project

“In November 2009, South Korea set a target to reduce its carbon emissions by 30% from the predicted level by 2020.”

Korea Southern Power (KOSPO) is in the process of building a thermal power plant that is designed with carbon emissions reduction in mind. The $3bn Samcheok Green Power Project will employ low grade coal and supercritical CFB (circulating fluidised bed) boilers.

In July 2011, global engineering and construction firm Foster Wheeler announced that Hyundai E&C, the project’s main contractor, had given the firm the go ahead to design and supply four 500MW CFB boilers, which will provide steam to two 1100MW Toshiba turbines at the utility.

Unlike conventional pulverized coal (PC) technology, CFBs allow for the use of lower calorie coal – 4,000 kcal/kg compared to 6,000 kcal/kg typically used in a PC boiler – plus five percent biomass (woodchips), therefore helping KOSPO to reduce fuel costs and widen its procurement possibilities, without requiring add-on flue gas desulfurization equipment.

FW’s CFB boilers are scheduled for commercial operations in June 2014, after which four more of these units, plus another two steam turbines, will be added to the project.

This green power development is also expected to incorporate renewable power technologies onsite, including roof-top solar panels and photovoltaic arrays, wind turbines, wave energy and fuel cells – bringing the total installed capacity to 5,000MW.

The seawater-cooled plant is being built across a 2.6 square metre area using rock excavated from the seashore, and will also feature a covered coal yard, and a carbon dioxide research centre, which will explore carbon capture and storage technologies.

Coal will be transported to the power plant underground via culvert conveyors, while ash generated at the facility will be exported for use in aggregates and land reclamation.


Related content


Yonghungdo Power Plant, South Korea

The $2.5bn 1,600MW Yonghungdo plant has been completed on the Yonghungdo island near Inchon, South Korea. The plant is owned and operated by Korean Electric Power Co (KEPCO).

Song Hau 1 Coal-fired Power Plant, Vietnam

Vietnam Oil & Gas Group (PetroVietnam or PVN) is constructing a 1,200MW coal-fired power plant known as Song Hau 1.

Japanese firms win orders for combined cycle power plants in Korea

Marubeni Corporation in partnership with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) has received contracts to supply equipment for three combined cycle electric power projects in South Korea.

The race is on – five countries making the most of their marine power potential

Hydro and marine power energy is making a splash worldwide – but which country has the most potential to capitalise?